> Also one neat part would be that the HTTP binding could use something like > Content-Encoding: x-paswa to declare that the message use this specific > encoding of a SOAP envelope (if we don't want to define another MIME > type). That's interesting. It's specific to HTTP, but I imagine that most transports will have an analogous function. In any case, if we go down a binding route, we'll need to specify something seperate for each transport anyway. Thinking out loud, if it were done as something like a HTTP content-coding, it would almost seem better to invent a new, non-XML syntax to allow it to be more compact and efficient to process (as well as not confusing the matter)...Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 20:03:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:14 GMT