Are the following messages semantically equivalent (namespace declarations omitted for brevity)? <S:Envelope> <S:Header></S:Header> <S:Body><tns:foo/></S:Body> </S:Envelope> and <S:Envelope> <S:Body><tns:foo/></S:Body> </S:Envelope> In other words, if there are no headers, are message processors allowed to insert/delete an empty Header element? I believe the answer is yes, as I can't find text that says otherwise. And what if there are no EII's for the Body, can that be omitted? <S:Envelope> <S:Header><tns:foo/></S:Header> </S:Envelope> and <S:Envelope> </S:Envelope> This has implications for message normalization and the ability to sign SOAP messages. /r$ -- Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.htmlReceived on Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:18:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:14 GMT