MTOM issue: does the HTTP update need to be a feature?

Hi all,  (repost from the WG list)

I have a question about the MTOM document: does the HTTP implementation
of the abstract feature actually need to be a SOAP feature? 

I thought that we would somehow extend the HTTP binding so that it
implements section 2 using section 3. Section 4 doesn't do that
extension, it introduces a feature that still has to be incorporated
into the HTTP binding. So I suggest we rework section 4 to become the
glue between our HTTP binding and section 3. It would keep most of
section 4.3.

Best regards,

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect
                   Systinet Corporation
                   http://www.systinet.com/

Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 15:02:15 UTC