W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > June 2003

Re: New PR issue: one or more ultimate receiver?

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:57:55 +0200
Message-ID: <3EF037A3.1060501@crf.canon.fr>
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
CC: XMLP Public <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

Yes, I very much agree. I certainly don't want us to go back to PR (or 
worse). I regard this change as simply editorial.

Thank you.

Jean-Jacques.

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:

> Jean-Jacques Moreau writes:
> 
> 
>>> Let's not open that can of worms, if possible, and focus instead
>>> on the other part of the issue, which is that we have somehow
>>> lost a change, and I essentially propose that we put it back.
> 
> 
> Indeed.  As long as all concerned agree that it is editorial and will
> not send us back through the review process, it's fine with me.   My
> comments were only to make the case that we don't want to delay PR
> for any other considerations relating to multicast, and I think you
> are agreeing.  I don't attach the same significance to the "the/an"
> change that you do, but perhaps for exactly that reason I have no
> problem with it either.  Thanks!
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036 
> IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676 
> One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2003 05:56:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:14 GMT