W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > June 2003

Re: New PR issue: one or more ultimate receiver?

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:50:39 +0200
Message-ID: <3EEDAF0F.20806@crf.canon.fr>
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org

+1 too, but I don't think this was the point of my original note, as was 
reiterated here[1].

Jean-Jacques.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2003Jun/0044.html

Mark Baker wrote:

> Yep, +1. I was just going to point out the same thing using
> load balancing as an example.
> 
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:02:53PM -0400, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> 
>>I believe we are quite clear that SOAP says 
>>nothing about whether the implementation of a SOAP node such as the 
>>endpoint is distributed or replicated.
> 
> 
> MB
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 07:50:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:14 GMT