W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > June 2003

RE: New Attachments Issues

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:14:43 -0700
Message-ID: <7C083876C492EB4BAAF6B3AE0732970E0BC28335@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Marc Hadley" <marc_hadley@mac.com>
Cc: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>, "XMLP Dist App" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

Yes, this was part of the 'set-up cost' in my test. I have yet to write
a test for doing base64 conversion 'in chunks' but I plan to do so soon.

Gudge 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Hadley [mailto:marc_hadley@mac.com] 
> Sent: 12 June 2003 18:10
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: Jacek Kopecky; XMLP Dist App
> Subject: Re: New Attachments Issues
> 
> On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 13:39 US/Eastern, Martin Gudgin wrote:
> >
> > I would observ that signature computation seems to be directly 
> > proportional to the size of the date being signed ( note that this 
> > does NOT include the initialization of the signature 
> computation with 
> > keys etc. ). Therefore, it would be reasonable to assume that 
> > computing the sig over base64 would take exactly a third 
> longer than 
> > computing the sig over the binary.
> >
> and you need to add the time to convert from binary to base64.
> 
> Marc.
> 
> --
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2003 13:14:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:14 GMT