W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2003

RE: [Fwd: Re: Bug in 2.3.0 ... or bug in SOAP schema?]

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 02:37:50 -0800
Message-ID: <92456F6B84D1324C943905BEEAE0278E02F4445D@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Jesus M. Salvo Jr." <jesus.salvo@migasia.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

I know it's based on xs:boolean, but the type is NOT xs:boolean, it's a restriction of xs:boolean.
 
Gudge

________________________________

From: Jesus M. Salvo Jr. [mailto:jesus.salvo@migasia.com]
Sent: Mon 24/02/2003 23:47
To: Martin Gudgin
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Bug in 2.3.0 ... or bug in SOAP schema?]





Martin Gudgin wrote:

>Well, the canonical rep for xs:boolean is false, but this isn't xs:boolean,
>

You just said the problem ... the definition says:

<xs:restriction base='xs:boolean'>


So it is a boolean, but the representation are '0' and '1'.

>it's a type that only allows the lexical reps '1' and '0', so I'm not certain that rule applies...
>
>I'll check with the XML Schema WG.
>
>Gudge
>
> 
>
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2003 05:38:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:13 GMT