Martin Gudgin wrote: >Well, the canonical rep for xs:boolean is false, but this isn't xs:boolean, > You just said the problem ... the definition says: <xs:restriction base='xs:boolean'> So it is a boolean, but the representation are '0' and '1'. >it's a type that only allows the lexical reps '1' and '0', so I'm not certain that rule applies... > >I'll check with the XML Schema WG. > >Gudge > > >Received on Monday, 24 February 2003 18:45:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:13 GMT