RE: AFTF requirements, pre-2003/01/31 telcon

Streaming is very important to me too. I don't think that mapping the
serialization to an Infoset defeats streaming. 

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com] 
> Sent: 04 February 2003 02:52
> To: John J. Barton
> Cc: Martin Gudgin; noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com; 
> jones@research.att.com; Sanjiva Weerawarana; xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: RE: AFTF requirements, pre-2003/01/31 telcon
> 
> 
> > Ok, so now I am complete confused.  The likely outcome from 
> the AFTF 
> > effort would be a specification that would lead to a software 
> > component in a SOAP engine preceding XML parsing.  The 
> component would 
> > pull bits off the wire and prepare them for application level 
> > processing.
> 
> I hope it's not going to be required that ALL bits be pulled 
> off the wire before being processed. I'd like to use SOAP 
> with streaming media. (I think that also argues against the 
> Infoset proposal.)
>         /r$
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 10:25:30 UTC