W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Issue 374: use of term "part" in attachment feature document

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 08:18:07 -0700
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D08E92473@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>



I am fine either way. I am also ok with Hervé's suggestion of making it editorially stand out more as a note. 

Henrik

>Personally, I'd recommend no-action, since the glossary 
>section[1] already contains definition for "Primary SOAP message 
>part" and "Secondary part". This, IMO, is enough to disambiguate 
>the term "part".

Received on Monday, 16 September 2002 11:18:38 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen: "RE: New LC issue: Ambiguity: SOAP body or SOAP body child element"
Previous message: Jean-Jacques Moreau: "Encoding examples (was: Issue 282)"
Maybe in reply to: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen: "Issue 374: use of term "part" in attachment feature document"
Next in thread: David C. Fallside: "RE: Issue 374: use of term "part" in attachment feature document"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:54 GMT