W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

Re: New AFTF draft.

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:03:30 +0200
Message-ID: <3D7F14F2.3040805@crf.canon.fr>
To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
CC: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>, Herve Ruellan <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, xml-dist-app@w3.org, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>

They're not resources, but representations of resources? 
Personally, I think part reads better than resource in this context.

Jean-Jacques.

Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> Well, there's 'resource' which fits in nicely with the Web architecture.
> 
> e.g.
>         "Compound SOAP structure
>          A compound SOAP structure consists of a primary SOAP message part
>          and zero or more related resources."
> 
> I would even go as far as to add: "identified by a URI".
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 06:03:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:11 GMT