Overall I think it looks OK though I share many of the concerns raised by Chris Ferris[1]. On the editorial front I would like to recommend redressing the balance between MIME and DIME by adding a reference to the SOAP with Attachments note[1] rather than just MIME itself. I would also recommend that the bibliography entries for WS-Attachments, WS-Security and SOAP with Attachments be moved to a new section; "Non-normative References" in line with approach taken for parts 1 and 2 of the spec. On the technical front I wonder whether the spec should require/specify support for at least the CID[3] referencing scheme, rather than punting this completely to the packaging spec specification. This wouldn't preclude a packaging spec introducing additional referencing schemes but would provide at least a minimum of functionality common to all packaging specs. Regards, Marc. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jul/0233.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP-attachments [3] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2111.txt -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Center, Sun Microsystems.Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 14:51:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:11 GMT