On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jacek Kopecky wrote: > > Hi all, 8-) > it will be a pity if SOAP, as provided by the W3C, is limited to > RESTful application (because we don't want to promote RESTless > applications over HTTP, do we?) > I don't think the charter imposes such a limitation, and I have > yet to see an example of a RESTful application which is benefited > by using SOAP (as opposed to HTTP alone). Surely the SOAP Encoding conventions are useful for RESTful applications? (although that's only a small piece of SOAP 1.2 itself...) Dan > It may come down to the question of why it's W3C and not IETF > who works on SOAP, but I'm not trying to propose that W3C drop > the XML Protocol effort. > Best regards, > > Jacek Kopecky > > Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation > http://www.systinet.com/ > > > > On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote: > > > > > I propose that we rule this[1] out-of-scope and close it with no action. > > > > Gudge > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x301 > > > >Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 15:08:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:11 GMT