W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Issue 301: Universal Transport Binding

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 09:08:53 +0200 (CEST)
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209020908370.12255-100000@mail.idoox.com>

 Hi all, 8-)
 it will be a pity if SOAP, as provided by the W3C, is limited to 
RESTful application (because we don't want to promote RESTless 
applications over HTTP, do we?) 
 I don't think the charter imposes such a limitation, and I have
yet to see an example of a RESTful application which is benefited
by using SOAP (as opposed to HTTP alone).
 It may come down to the question of why it's W3C and not IETF
who works on SOAP, but I'm not trying to propose that W3C drop 
the XML Protocol effort.
 Best regards,

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote:

 > 
 > I propose that we rule this[1] out-of-scope and close it with no action.
 > 
 > Gudge
 > 
 > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x301
 > 
Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 03:08:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:11 GMT