- From: Herve Ruellan <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:25:05 +0100
- To: "Williams Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: "'Martin Gudgin'" <marting@develop.com>, Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Hi Stuart,
Williams, Stuart wrote:
>>>Consider this graph:
>>>
>>> edgeB +-------------+
>>> +-------------->+ "terminalB" |
>>> | +-------------+
>>> |
>>> +----+----+ edgeA +-------------+
>>> | structA +--------->+ "terminalA" |
>>> +----+----+ +-------------+
>>> |
>>> | edgeC +---------+ edgeD +-------------+
>>> +-------------->+ structB +------->+ "terminalD" |
>>> +----+----+ +-------------+
>>> |
>>> | edgeF +-------------+
>>> +-------------+ "terminalE" |
>>> +-------------+
I would encode this graph like this:
<myGraph>
<edgeA>terminalA</edgeA>
<edgeB>terminalB</edgeB>
<edgeC>
<edgeD>terminalD</edgeD>
<edgeF>terminalF</edgeF>
</edgeC>
</myGraph>
The "myGraph" element representing the context in which you want to pass
your graph (it might be the element corresponding to an argument of a
RPC for exemple).
Hope this helps,
Hervé.
Received on Friday, 15 March 2002 10:27:05 UTC