Re: Henrik's media type comments

Hi Mark!

> > I haven't kept current with the twisted state of SOAPAction, but I
can't
> > find reference to it in Adjuncts (except an indirect reference to
> > "parameters" in the media type registration), and the change notes
> > indicate it's been removed to the I-D. There seems to be a missing
link
> > here; does SOAPAction need to be exposed as a property?
>
> If you mean as a media type parameter, then yes, that's what we agreed
> in the WG.

I mean, if SOAPAction is something that implementations need to know about
and manipulate (i.e., senders need to specify the value), shouldn't it be
exposed as an abstract property (i.e., have a URI)?


> Remind me what you edited again? 8-)  I'll update your details.

Heh. Seriously, I have no objection if you drop me off.


> Congrats on the move to BEA!  Raise hell. 8-)

Thanks. Hell is on my todo list.