W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Question about the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema

From: Simon Fell <simon@zaks.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:32:34 -0800
Message-ID: <001501c19ed5$5021f570$1214a8c0@vfonet.com>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Makes sense, but the current 1.1 schema is now based on the 1.2 schema, can
we at least get the 1.1 schema fixed ?

Cheers
Simon

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>
To: "Simon Fell" <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: Question about the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema


> This was the case with the SOAP 1.1 schema aswell[2]. My recollection is
> that the reason we don't allow encodingStyle on elements in the SOAP
> namespace is that those elements do not follow a particular encoding
style.
> It is the *children* of soap:Header/soap:Body that have a particular
> encoding style.
>
> Gudge
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Fell" <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
> To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:37 PM
> Subject: Question about the SOAP 1.2 envelope schema
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking at the SOAP 1.2 Envelope schema[1], I don't beleive that
> the schema as it stands allows for the encodingStyle attribute to appear
on
> the Envelope or Header elements, whilst the prose allow for that
situation,
> however my understanding of XSD is shakey enough that i could be wrong.
> Shouldn't the Envelope and Header complex types include an attributeGroup
> reference to the encodingStyle attribute group ? Also is there any reason
> why encodingStyle uses an attribute group ?
>
> Thanks
> Simon
> www.pocketsoap.com
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 16:33:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:06 GMT