> Mark, > I'm not sure the wording "envelope URI" is clear. > Do you mean the access URI or the root element namespace URI? I don't know what you mean by "access URI". I mean the latter. I'll fix, thanks. > Even though I don't object to the envelope parameter, I still > think action is inappropriate for "intenet" and "type" are two > different orthogonal things and should be kept as such. Envelope > version is part of the type but intent may vary for one message > on different servers. I'll be happy to use whatever the WG decides. MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.comReceived on Friday, 4 January 2002 12:33:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:05 GMT