W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Draft registration of application/soap+xml

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:33:38 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200201041733.MAA14003@markbaker.ca>
To: jacek@systinet.com (Jacek Kopecky)
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
>  Mark,
>  I'm not sure the wording "envelope URI" is clear.
>  Do you mean the access URI or the root element namespace URI?

I don't know what you mean by "access URI".  I mean the latter.
I'll fix, thanks.

>  Even though I don't object to the envelope parameter, I still
> think action is inappropriate for "intenet" and "type" are two
> different orthogonal things and should be kept as such.  Envelope
> version is part of the type but intent may vary for one message
> on different servers.

I'll be happy to use whatever the WG decides.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 12:33:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:05 GMT