I don't think it's necessary to get into the whole tunneled thing here. It is simpler (and less controversial) to say that the message may avail itself of underlying transport-level security, and/or that XML features such as DSIG and XMLENC may be used to provide soap-level security features. > The SOAP processing model itself is entirely innocuous from a security > perspective. I don't think so, since it doesn't seem feasible to encrypt the actor and mustUnderstand values. If a message is intended to go A->B->C->D but encrypted so only B knows the C-uri, then an adversary could redirect the message from B directly to D. /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption http://www.zolera.comReceived on Friday, 4 January 2002 12:32:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:05 GMT