W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP

From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:21:37 -0400
Message-ID: <3CBF1CC1.8050104@sun.com>
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org, John Ibbotson <john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com>, moreau@crf.canon.fr, Martin Gudgin <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@uk.sun.com>
what's wrong with simple-request-response

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:

> The spec editors took an action item to request input on determining the
> name for "single-request-response MEP" described in part 2 [1]. John
> Ibbotson recently brought up the issue that it was not particularly well
> described as to what was meant.
> 
> The editors have taken the feedback and attempted to clarify the text
> (already in [1]) but did not manage to come up with a better short name,
> partly because such names tend to describe single aspects rather than a
> complete picture. Therefore, unless we hear strongly otherwise, the
> proposal is to keep the existing short name.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
> mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
> 
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/04/11/soap12-part2-1.55.html#singlereq
> respmep
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 15:22:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT