- From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:21:37 -0400
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org, John Ibbotson <john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com>, moreau@crf.canon.fr, Martin Gudgin <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@uk.sun.com>
what's wrong with simple-request-response Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > The spec editors took an action item to request input on determining the > name for "single-request-response MEP" described in part 2 [1]. John > Ibbotson recently brought up the issue that it was not particularly well > described as to what was meant. > > The editors have taken the feedback and attempted to clarify the text > (already in [1]) but did not manage to come up with a better short name, > partly because such names tend to describe single aspects rather than a > complete picture. Therefore, unless we hear strongly otherwise, the > proposal is to keep the existing short name. > > Comments? > > Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/04/11/soap12-part2-1.55.html#singlereq > respmep > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 15:22:59 UTC