RE: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. action parameter from Henrik Frystyk Nielsen on 2002-04-16 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from April 2002)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 11:46:07 -0700
To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D05A543D7@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Hmm, I was referring to the media type draft - I know this may sound
silly but do we have other drafts not linked from [2]?

Henrik

[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/#drafts

>> 3) The spec editors should add a note to the spec that we know that 
>> this is an ID with no standing.
>
>FYI, [1] is winding its way through the process; if it becomes 
>standard, 
>the I-D will not become necessary (W3C will be able to 
>directly request 
>the header registration from IANA, IIRC). It's probably still 
>a safe bet 
>to maintain the draft for the time being, though.

Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 14:46:39 UTC