- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 11:27:45 -0700
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:13 AM, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > > 1) I would say that we should only have it in one place and like the > direction of moving it entirely into the media type definition as a > parameter. Agreed. > 2.A) We leave it entirely up to the media type being used to indicate in > some manner that this is a SOAP message. Personally, I prefer this, as long as some guidance is given to new media type authors. > 3) The spec editors should add a note to the spec that we know that this > is an ID with no standing. FYI, [1] is winding its way through the process; if it becomes standard, the I-D will not become necessary (W3C will be able to directly request the header registration from IANA, IIRC). It's probably still a safe bet to maintain the draft for the time being, though. 1. http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klyne-msghdr- registry-04.txt -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 14:27:46 UTC