W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

[Issue, March 20th 2002] Serializer vs. De-serializer

From: Asir S Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 07:55:51 -0400
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OKEBJFDOCNPMPLOONLOICEGBCBAA.asirv@webmethods.com>
I raised this issue on March 20th, 2002 [1]. Original text is,

"[Comment B] Section 3.1 says that rules are described "from the perspective
of a de-serializer".  But,

- title for section 3.1 is 'Rules for Encoding'
- sub section titles are 'Encoding ...
- section 3.1.1 is a rule for serializing an edge
- section 3.1.3 has rules for serializing generic, struct and array
- section 3.1.6 has rules to serialize the value of arraySize
- Appendix A has rules for serializing app defined names

BTW, in an ideal situation, I prefer rules for both serializing and
de-serializing. If that is not a possibility, then I prefer rules for
serializing as opposed to de-serializing."

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Mar/0193.html


Asir S Vedamuthu

webMethods, Inc.
703-460-2513 or asirv@webmethods.com
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 07:55:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:19 UTC