W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

RE: Issue 192 & R803

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 09:27:02 -0700
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D07160F30@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Cc: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>, "Christopher Ferris" <chris.ferris@sun.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

>Looks that way, to me this is a subtle change in semantics, the first 
>version says that the body of a fault message can only have 
>one fault in 
>the body but says nothing about any other EIIs in the body, the second 
>that the body can only have one fault and no accompanying EIIs. We 
>should be careful when incorporating comments like this that we don't 
>subvert the WG process...

Yes, I absolutely agree - good thing that this is now a part of a
proposal so that it is being called out!

Received on Monday, 15 April 2002 12:27:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:19 UTC