W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Issue #203 : First draft text

From: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:37:20 -0400
To: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFB80B4F4D.A8146184-ON85256B98.0071739C@lotus.com>
Overall I like this a lot.  A couple of minor points:

* "MUST clearly specify any known interactions with other extensions in terms 
of
semantics or sequence."  I think that should be : "MUST clearly specify any known interactions with or changes to the 
interpretation of the SOAP body.  Furthermore, MUST clearly specify any 
known interactions with or changes to the interpretation of other SOAP 
features (whether or not those features are themselves modules)."

The wording might need a bit of cleanup.  Two points I am trying to make 
are (1) interactions with the body need to be covered and (2) "extension" 
is not a word we use in the rec... its features, I think, and we need to 
cover the features that are headers as well as those that are not.

* * MAY indicate that the Module functions as an implementation of a SOAP 
Feature as defined in sec 3 of
  part 1.   <<= Didn't you define a module as a feature?  Do you mean one that 
follows the properties convention?  If so, you should refer specifically 
to the section on property conventions.

As I say, overall I like this a lot.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 16:53:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT