W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

Issue #203 : First draft text

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:07:27 -0400
Message-ID: <04ca01c1e109$6067b890$3820060a@MINIME>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Here's a first cut at some text for the spec which moves towards resolving
issue 203 [1].

IN SECTION 3, PART 1:

Add the following sentence to the end of the paragraph beginning "The SOAP
Processing Model enables SOAP Nodes..."

"A feature expressed as SOAP headers is known as a SOAP Module, and each Module
should be specified according
to the rules in section X" (where X is a new section somewhere)

IN SECTION X:

"A SOAP Module is a well-specified set of semantic extensions to the core
protocol, expressed as SOAP headers.

A Module specification:

* MUST identify itself with a URI.  This enables the Module to be unambiguously
referenced in description
  languages or during negotiation.

* MUST clearly and completely specify the content and semantics of the header
blocks used to implement the
  behavior in question, including if appropriate any modifications to the SOAP
Processing Model.

* MUST clearly specify any known interactions with other extensions in terms of
semantics or sequence.
  For example, we can imagine a Module which encrypts the body and inserts a
header containing a checksum and
  an indication of the encryption mechanism used.  The spec for such a Module
must indicate that the decryption
  algortihm on the receiving side must run prior to any Modules which rely on
the contents of the body.

* MAY indicate that the Module functions as an implementation of a SOAP Feature
as defined in sec 3 of
  part 1.  In this case, the spec must also clearly specify, if appropriate,
the relationships between any
  abstract properties defined in the feature spec (as described in sec 5 of
part 2) and concrete instantiations
  in the SOAP envelope."

I think this needs some wordsmithing (I'm sending this from the middle of a WG
meeting), but it's a start.  Comments / issues / questions appreciated!

--Glen
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 23:32:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT