W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for iss ue 192)

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:04:34 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F192AAA@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: henrikn@microsoft.com, moreau@crf.canon.fr, xml-dist-app@w3.org
I'd be ok either way, just felt that its wasn't something that had been
discussed much on the list. This question is also a bit orthogonal to the
other pieces in Henrik's proposal on 192 [1] - and really a different issue.

I don't think making the names of the children a Fault unqualified was an
oversight. I think it was quite a deliberate choice on the part of the
schema maintainer - I'm sure Gudge will correct me if I'm wrong about that.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Apr/0131.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM 
> [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: 10 April 2002 15:05
> To: Williams, Stuart
> Cc: henrikn@microsoft.com; moreau@crf.canon.fr; xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Updated proposal for issue 192
> Stuart Williams writes:
> >> These are locally scoped, unqualified elements whose
> >> 'meaning' is scoped by their containment in a 
> >> <env:Fault/> element.
> Yes, and <Body> only has meaning within an <Envelope>, and we qualify 
> that?  Though I don't think things are hugely broken, I think we should be

> consistent.  On balance, I would recommend qualifying everything.  Having 
> only <Envelope> qualified, but not anything else seems quite fragile to 
> me.  It's also in some sense an artifact of how you view the description 
> of the SOAP envelope, creeping into the syntax of the envelope itself.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 12:05:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:19 UTC