W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

New issues (was: Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 14:45:10 +0200
Message-ID: <3CAD9C56.E6896445@crf.canon.fr>
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
CC: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Suggested issues, raised by Noah.

Jean-Jacques.

Issue1
------
* Section 5.4.2: Should we allow xml:lang on faultString?  This
will
probably be a concern for the internationalization folks.

Issue2
-------
* Section 5.4.1: the third bullet indicates that a fault code
element may
have one or two child element information items.  The first is a
mandatory
value, the second is an optional subcode.  Question: do we
require these to
occur in order?  The current specification does not say, and
therefore
implies that order is insignificant.  The same question arises
later in
this section in the discussion of subcode.
Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 07:47:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT