W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Faultactor or faultnode?

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:30:10 +0200 (CEST)
To: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
cc: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204031530080.20384-100000@mail.idoox.com>
+1

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:

 > I hate to bring this one to the list... but, in the interest of
 > coherency, I would like to suggest that we rename "faultactor" to
 > "faultnode".
 > 
 > Jean-Jacques.
 > 
 > 
 > Background
 > --------------
 > Frequency of the word "actor": 0 occurrences (part 1)
 > Frequency of the word "node": 135 occurrences (part 1)
 > 
 > Definition for "faultactor" [1] (excerpt): "The value of the
 > faultactor element information item is the URI that identifies
 > the SOAP node that generated the fault."
 > 
 > Quote from Chris [2]: "If the intent (as I understand from 4.4.3
 > [Now 5.4.3]) is to identify the source node of the Fault, then it
 > would be my recommendation that the element be renamed so as to
 > infer that semantic intent,. e.g. faultnode."
 > 
 > 
 > [1]
 > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part1.html#faultactorelement
 > 
 > [2]
 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/0007.html
 > 
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 08:30:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT