W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

Faultactor or faultnode?

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 15:00:13 +0200
Message-ID: <3CAAFCDD.87BC6B63@crf.canon.fr>
To: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I hate to bring this one to the list... but, in the interest of
coherency, I would like to suggest that we rename "faultactor" to


Frequency of the word "actor": 0 occurrences (part 1)
Frequency of the word "node": 135 occurrences (part 1)

Definition for "faultactor" [1] (excerpt): "The value of the
faultactor element information item is the URI that identifies
the SOAP node that generated the fault."

Quote from Chris [2]: "If the intent (as I understand from 4.4.3
[Now 5.4.3]) is to identify the source node of the Fault, then it
would be my recommendation that the element be renamed so as to
infer that semantic intent,. e.g. faultnode."


Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 08:02:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:19 UTC