W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

Faultactor or faultnode?

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 15:00:13 +0200
Message-ID: <3CAAFCDD.87BC6B63@crf.canon.fr>
To: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I hate to bring this one to the list... but, in the interest of
coherency, I would like to suggest that we rename "faultactor" to
"faultnode".

Jean-Jacques.


Background
--------------
Frequency of the word "actor": 0 occurrences (part 1)
Frequency of the word "node": 135 occurrences (part 1)

Definition for "faultactor" [1] (excerpt): "The value of the
faultactor element information item is the URI that identifies
the SOAP node that generated the fault."

Quote from Chris [2]: "If the intent (as I understand from 4.4.3
[Now 5.4.3]) is to identify the source node of the Fault, then it
would be my recommendation that the element be renamed so as to
infer that semantic intent,. e.g. faultnode."


[1]
http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part1.html#faultactorelement

[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/0007.html
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 08:02:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT