I hate to bring this one to the list... but, in the interest of coherency, I would like to suggest that we rename "faultactor" to "faultnode". Jean-Jacques. Background -------------- Frequency of the word "actor": 0 occurrences (part 1) Frequency of the word "node": 135 occurrences (part 1) Definition for "faultactor" [1] (excerpt): "The value of the faultactor element information item is the URI that identifies the SOAP node that generated the fault." Quote from Chris [2]: "If the intent (as I understand from 4.4.3 [Now 5.4.3]) is to identify the source node of the Fault, then it would be my recommendation that the element be renamed so as to infer that semantic intent,. e.g. faultnode." [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part1.html#faultactorelement [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/0007.htmlReceived on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 08:02:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT