W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > October 2001

Re: SOAP Binding Framework Concerns

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:39:22 +0200
Message-ID: <3BD9759A.90C94C1C@crf.canon.fr>
To: Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
CC: Marwan Sabbouh <ms@mitre.org>, Kumeda <kumeda@atc.yamatake.co.jp>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Williams Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org

Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com wrote:

> Marwah Sabbouh writes:
> >> It seems to me that the SOAP application
> >> programmer still needs ( and wants) to specify the protocol
> >> he needs to use.
> Perhaps this is the essence of the disagreement.  When I write a program
> to read a file, I typically don't know at the time I write and compile the
> program whether I will read from a hard drive or a floppy, NTFS vs. FAT or
> whatever.   Of course, when I run the program, it will be one or the
> other.  Indeed, sometimes the same program on Unix can read from a socket,
> pipe or tape drive too.  The general notions of Open/Close/Read/Write are
> analagous to our binding framework:  they state what's common across all
> these diverse data management systems.
> The mechanisms of the binding framework allow a similar and very important
> late coupling for SOAP applications.  With respect, I claim that in many
> cases I do _not_ want to hard code knowledge of the transport into my
> application business logic.  I want to say:  "send this envelope as a soap
> request, using whatever transport is appropriate."
Received on Friday, 26 October 2001 10:39:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:16 UTC