oops-too late Marwan Sabbouh wrote: > David; > > I thought I run this by you before I forward it to the mailing list. Please > comment. > > I am very concerned with the work taken place on the binding framework. > It seems as if we are creating a layer that sits between the > transport/transfer protocol and the SOAP layer. In my mind, there isn't > a physical layer that is called the binding layer. There isn't a > boundary between SOAP and the delivery protocol. More importantly, there isn;'t > "a contract between SOAP and the > bindings/underlying protocols that SOAP uses", as described in Stuart's email to > Glyn Normington. In my mind the contract is between the SOAP sender and > receiver. WSDL is a good example of such a contract. I invite the TBTF > workingb group to examine it. > > Instead, a Web service that > binds itself to a particular protocol, is then able to receive > messages using that protocol. In this context, aSOAP processor uses the > delivery mechanism specified by this service. I am afraid we are making > it far more difficult than it needs to be. > What am I missing? > > MarwanReceived on Friday, 19 October 2001 09:09:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:04 GMT