W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2001

Re: New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 17:16:45 +0100 (CET)
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111201713070.11398-100000@mail.idoox.com>
 OK, now the question can be "Do we want only partial checks?"
 I'd be opposed to that, I'll go with none or full checking,
partial feels wrong.
 What do you think about opening the new issue, anyway? If you
agree with me that complete checking would be overkill and that
partial checking is not recommendable, I can withdraw the issue
request. 8-)

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Rich Salz wrote:

 > No, actually, I was only talking about places where referencer and
 > referencee could clash, not the general issue.
 >
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2001 11:16:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:05 GMT