W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution

From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:39:40 -0800
Message-ID: <016501c16eef$944f2b20$6eb86b83@greyarea>
To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, "Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>, <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Why not this?

    <actor href='actoruri' mustUnderstand='true' >
      <myHeader1/>
      <myHeader2/>
      <myHeader3/>
    </actor>

    <actor href='someotheractoruri' mustUnderstand='true'>
      <myHeader3/>
      <myHeader4/>
    </actor>

Gudge


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>; <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>;
"Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>; <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution


> +1 (sorry Gudge, only [-1,+1] 8-)
>
> I see no merit to that proposal.
>
> > Only as a mandatory extension and only by effectively redeploying *all*
> > existing SOAP nodes.
>
> Right, plus we wouldn't be able to keep the existing attribute based
> syntax, since our mandatory extension mechanism is element based.
> We'd have to have something like;
>
> <header>
>  <myheader id="foo" ... />
>  ...
>  <actors mustUnderstand="1">
>   <actor ref="foo" value="http://...">
>   <actor ref="some-other-id-to-another-header" value="http://...">
>  </actors>
>  ...
>
> Blech!
>
> MB
> --
> Mark Baker, CSO, Planetfred.
> Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.
> mbaker@planetfred.com
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 17:47:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:04 GMT