W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:40:18 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200111161540.KAA06177@markbaker.ca>
To: henrikn@microsoft.com (Henrik Frystyk Nielsen)
Cc: marting@develop.com (Martin Gudgin), Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com, dug@us.ibm.com (Doug Davis), skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1 (sorry Gudge, only [-1,+1] 8-)

I see no merit to that proposal.

> Only as a mandatory extension and only by effectively redeploying *all*
> existing SOAP nodes.

Right, plus we wouldn't be able to keep the existing attribute based
syntax, since our mandatory extension mechanism is element based.
We'd have to have something like;

 <myheader id="foo" ... />
 <actors mustUnderstand="1">
  <actor ref="foo" value="http://...">
  <actor ref="some-other-id-to-another-header" value="http://...">


Mark Baker, CSO, Planetfred.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 10:48:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:16 UTC