- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:40:18 -0500 (EST)
- To: henrikn@microsoft.com (Henrik Frystyk Nielsen)
- Cc: marting@develop.com (Martin Gudgin), Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com, dug@us.ibm.com (Doug Davis), skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1 (sorry Gudge, only [-1,+1] 8-) I see no merit to that proposal. > Only as a mandatory extension and only by effectively redeploying *all* > existing SOAP nodes. Right, plus we wouldn't be able to keep the existing attribute based syntax, since our mandatory extension mechanism is element based. We'd have to have something like; <header> <myheader id="foo" ... /> ... <actors mustUnderstand="1"> <actor ref="foo" value="http://..."> <actor ref="some-other-id-to-another-header" value="http://..."> </actors> ... Blech! MB -- Mark Baker, CSO, Planetfred. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 10:48:42 UTC