RE: Positions on issue 19

Note that "no namespace" doesn't mean "the global null namespace". That
is, if I have unqualified "foo" in one context and unqualified "foo" in
another context then I can say nothing about how the two relate
regardless of them having the same unqualified name.

Henrik

>"> > These elements are unqualified. Their namespace name is "" "
>
>Yes. These elements are unqualified. It does not say that they 
>are in the "" namespace.
>
>The reference [1] that I have with me says,
>
>"if the URI reference in a default namespace declaration is 
>empty, then unprefixed elements in the scope of the 
>declaration are not considered to be in any namespace"