----- Original Message ----- From: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com> To: "Asir S Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>; "Gudgin, Martin" <marting@develop.com>; "Xml-Dist-App@W3. Org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Cc: "Allen Brown" <allenbr@microsoft.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:02 PM Subject: RE: Positions on issue 19 Note that "no namespace" doesn't mean "the global null namespace". That is, if I have unqualified "foo" in one context and unqualified "foo" in another context then I can say nothing about how the two relate regardless of them having the same unqualified name. Henrik [MJG] OK, now i'm confused. What's the 'global null namespace'? And how does it differ from 'no namespace'? Surely unqualified is unqualified. No more need be said... GudgeReceived on Tuesday, 29 May 2001 17:16:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:01 GMT