Re: SOAPAction Proposal

From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com> Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 22:46:09 +0100 Message-ID: <002f01c0d675$f7839f90$0300a8c0@greyarea> To: "Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:01 GMT

Hi Dave,

Can you share with us what it is your implementation puts into SOAPAction
and how it is used?

Cheers

Martin

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: SOAPAction Proposal

> A general question of philosophy. Is breakage an issue? If not now, when
> will it be an issue?
>
> Consider that real SOAP 1.1 deployment is happening now, the results of
the
> interop work, and as that's happening developers will start to build apps
> that depend on the interop.
>
> As a vendor of one of these implementations, I have a stake in continued
> interop, if this should fail this will result in breakage for my
customers.
> They will be right to ask why we didn't coordinate better.
>
> I bring this up in the context of SOAPAction headers, because we use them,
> and believe we are in accordance with the SOAP 1.1 spec.
>
> Dave
>