- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 11:34:44 -0700
- To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "'Daniel Barclay'" <Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com>, "'Henrik Frystyk Nielsen'" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 09:20:51AM +0100, Williams, Stuart wrote: > > > > > Also, would we qualify as a "standards track document within the IETF > > > Applications Area."? > > > > No, we're not a document. :-) > > Ok... :-) re-phrasing then: > > Will a future XMLP spec qualify as an "standards track document within the > IETF Applications Area."? The way that we're doing this in P3P was to author a compact, minimal internet-draft explaining the semantics and relevence of what is being registered (an HTTP header in our case; actually, there isn't an HTTP header registry, but same principle), and then pursue that on an individual-submission standard track. This would mean that the entire SOAP/XMLP effort would not need to go through the IETF process, just a document explaining what we're doing that needs to get registered. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2001 14:35:15 UTC