On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 09:20:51AM +0100, Williams, Stuart wrote: > > > > > Also, would we qualify as a "standards track document within the IETF > > > Applications Area."? > > > > No, we're not a document. :-) > > Ok... :-) re-phrasing then: > > Will a future XMLP spec qualify as an "standards track document within the > IETF Applications Area."? The way that we're doing this in P3P was to author a compact, minimal internet-draft explaining the semantics and relevence of what is being registered (an HTTP header in our case; actually, there isn't an HTTP header registry, but same principle), and then pursue that on an individual-submission standard track. This would mean that the entire SOAP/XMLP effort would not need to go through the IETF process, just a document explaining what we're doing that needs to get registered. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Thursday, 3 May 2001 14:35:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:44 GMT