W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2001

RE: Announce: A Busy Developer's Guide to SOAP 1.1

From: Mike Dierken <mike@DataChannel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:55:58 -0800
Message-ID: <8E864C73E16B864BB594712EDB3C89A0B279AE@belmail2.datachannel.com>
To: "'Ken MacLeod'" <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
> > 
> > (statically typed languages are sooo 20th century ;-)
> 
> I don't believe the issue is between dynamic or static (did you mean
> manifestly?) typed languages.  Perl, for example, has no problem with
> not having explicit type declarations (at least in the range we're
> talking about with XML-RPC ;-).  "Strongly typed", maybe?
> 
Or is it a difference between 'early binding' and 'late binding'?
Or 'automatic type conversion'?
Received on Friday, 30 March 2001 11:56:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:00 GMT