W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2001

RE: SOAP actor model

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:11:01 -0000
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F192325@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'frystyk@microsoft.com'" <frystyk@microsoft.com>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Henrik,

Thanks... I'll take a look... I had to skip the 2nd day of the October F2F.

regards

stuart

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen [mailto:frystyk@microsoft.com]
> Sent: 22 March 2001 15:06
> To: 'Williams, Stuart'; 'Mark Nottingham'
> Cc: 'Mark Jones'; xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: RE: SOAP actor model
> 
> 
> 
> One place that it is described is in the presentation that I 
> gave at the
> first f2f
> 
>    
> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/Admin/minutes-oct1100/soap-xp-wg.htm
> or
>    
> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/Admin/minutes-oct1100/soap-xp-wg.ppt
> 
> Linked from
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/Admin/minutes-oct1100/minutes.html
> 
> It talks about "horizontal" composability which is the actor model and
> the "vertical" composability which is the header model.
> 
> Henrik
> 
> >> The interesting thing about this point is that *if* this 
> is the case 
> >> then they are able to use the current SOAP composability 
> >model which I
> >                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >Where is the best articulation of this model? I have not been 
> >able to find it articulated in the SOAP 1.1 specification.
> 
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2001 11:11:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:59 GMT