W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2001

Re: ARe: Abstract Model contribution for Intermediairies (repost)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:52:51 +0100
Message-ID: <3AB082E3.13419DBF@crf.canon.fr>
To: Yuhichi Nakamura <NAKAMURY@jp.ibm.com>
CC: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Yuhichi Nakamura wrote:

> [...]
> For the first comment, I would restate my question: if there is an
> intermediary BEFORE the gateway, MUST it be recored in the path record?  The
> company who has the intial sender, the gateway, and the added intermediary
> would not like to give the address of the intermediary because it is located
> in their intranet.
> [...]

Ah, I see what you mean! Yes, you are right, this is an argument for NOT
recording the whole route. Does that mean that, on the way back, the message
will NOT go through the intermediary at all?

Jean-Jacques.
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2001 03:53:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:59 GMT