- From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:25:40 -0500
- CC: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote: > What about XMLP Service ? This would fit nicely with the forthcoming workshop on > Web Services... (I assume you meant to say "XMLP Service-user" and not "XMLP Service") This confusion between service in the abstract and real service is what I think we need to avoid. In the abstract (the old OSI service conventions), layer N provides "service" to layer N+1. I think we need to avoid using "service" in that sense. The workshop is about applications. That's what they mean by "services". I also don't like the use of "client" in this context, because of the confusion with the client/server model. I suggest "XMLP user". --Ray -- Ray Denenberg Library of Congress rden@loc.gov 202-707-5795
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2001 13:25:54 UTC