Martin, Thanks for doing this. Personally I like the general style of this. I like the precision the use of Infoset terminology gives. I also like the sense of structure that describing things in this way gives - exemplified mostly through the bulleted lists. It reminds me a bit of the style in the Schema Structures spec. [1] where the repeating style of various component definition sets a rigourous tone and helps folks navigate their with through the document - of course I think we probably have much less to describe :-) - but I do like the style. Regards Stuart Williams > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:marting@develop.com] > Sent: 20 June 2001 21:39 > To: XML Protocol Discussion > Subject: Infoset based rewrite of SOAP Section 4 > > > I've rewritten Section 4 of the SOAP 1.1[1] note in terms of the XML > Infoset[2]. The rewritten section can be found at[3]. My motivation was to > clean up that section, make sure each 'thing' is only defined once and > hopefully make things unambiguous. While doing so I found a couple of > inconsistencies. These are called out in 'ednote' style ( yellow > background ). > > Comments, suggestions, flames etc to the usual address. > > Regards > > Martin Gudgin > DevelopMentor > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/ > [3] http://marting.develop.com/xmlp/spec_sec4.html >Received on Friday, 29 June 2001 05:21:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:44 GMT