Dug, I agree, but this is not RPC specific, isn't it? Doug Davis wrote: > [...] I believe it is > valid to put multiple RPC calls in the body (each one being > its own body element) - if fact you can even put each RPC > as a separate header - there are lots of ways to do it. > But, the spec doesn't tell you how to handle things like > faults (or multiple faults) or rollback if the 3rd rpc > fails. So, if someone wants to do this it would be up > to them to decide how these issues are handled - as long > as they conform to the spec. Jean-Jacques.Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 07:23:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:01 GMT