W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2001

Re: Protocol Bindings

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:59:27 +0200
Message-ID: <3B4D4ACE.555A9715@crf.canon.fr>
To: christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
So you're saying a binding could be considered as a local intermediary? (or maybe
some bindings only?)

Jean-Jacques.

christopher ferris wrote:

> [...]
> Secondly, if I correctly understand Henrik's position a binding
> MAY actually transform the message by inserting headers which
> relate information that is not contained within the message,
> but is available to the software that effects the binding.
> e.g. the "binding" may actually perform as an actor in the SOAP
> sense. Conversely, a binding may consume header blocks that
> are targetted to it, thus effectively transforming the message.
> [...]
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 02:59:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:02 GMT