W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2001

Re: Protocol Bindings

From: christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 06:25:53 -0400
Message-ID: <3B4D7B31.C6323757@east.sun.com>
To: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Yes, quite possibly.

Cheers,

Chris

Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:
> 
> So you're saying a binding could be considered as a local intermediary? (or maybe
> some bindings only?)
> 
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
> christopher ferris wrote:
> 
> > [...]
> > Secondly, if I correctly understand Henrik's position a binding
> > MAY actually transform the message by inserting headers which
> > relate information that is not contained within the message,
> > but is available to the software that effects the binding.
> > e.g. the "binding" may actually perform as an actor in the SOAP
> > sense. Conversely, a binding may consume header blocks that
> > are targetted to it, thus effectively transforming the message.
> > [...]
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 06:28:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:02 GMT