Mark Baker wrote: > >>SOAPAction is now OPTIONAL per agreement made at the >>September f2f. >> > > Well, I wouldn't exactly call "negotiated", "optional". A SOAP sender > would have to be pretty daft to not support SOAPAction because any > recipient may require its use. > Whilst not wanting to re-open that can of worms, the spec does say: "SOAP Receivers MAY use it as a hint to optimise processing, but SHOULD NOT require its presence in order to operate." which is pretty strong discouragement against requiring it. Regards, Marc. -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2001 03:43:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:17 UTC