W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2001

Re: Issue #170 proposal - referencing to missing data

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 09:33:43 +0100
Message-ID: <3C0C8A67.56819CF3@crf.canon.fr>
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Is this the correct behaviour? Presumably, if a first header references a
second header targeted at '.../none', it does depend on that second header...
and hence I would expect the "SOAP Encoding processor" to deserialise both the
first and the second header. Or am I misinterpreting what you were suggesting?


Shouldn't the "SOAP Encoding processor"

Jacek Kopecky wrote:

>  I just disagree with the fact that whether or not to dereference
> the href attribute in SOAP Encoded data is dependent on
> application semantics.
>  If the application requires to be able to decide whether or not
> to dereference some URI, the URI must be a value in the data
> graph. IMO it's the SOAP Encoding processor that MUST handle SOAP
> Encoding references.
>  It is true though that the data wouldn't be deserialized (and
> therefore references needn't be resolved) for example on a header
> targeted at '.../none'. [...]
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2001 03:34:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:17 UTC