I made the exact same mistake that Rick made. Why? Because registering schema locations at a version/date-less URL is going to cause enormous compatibility problems in the future. Cheers, Dave Orchard XML Architect Jamcracker, Inc. 935 Stewart Dr. Sunnyvale, CA 94086 p: 408.830.1886 f: 408.328.0936 m: 604.908.6837 Named to Red Herring's list of 100 Most Important Companies: www.redherring.com/mag/issue79/herring100/jamcracker.html Named to Fortune's list of Cool Companies 2000: http://www.fortune.com/fortune/cool/coo.html -----Original Message----- From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Henrik Frystyk Nielsen Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 9:34 AM To: ricko@geotempo.com; xml-dist-app@w3.org Subject: RE: Schematron schema for SOAP 1.1 Envelopes Did you try and follow the links: http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ and http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/ They infact resolve to XSD schemas (and yes there are slight problems because SXD schemas have changed slightly since these were published). Henrik > The SOAP 1.1 spec suffers from not being expressed in a > schema language. > (RDF had the same problem.) > > I attaching a sample schema for SOAP 1.1 written using the > Schematron[1] > schema language. This uses Xpath expressions rather than being > interested in issues of data or storage types. [2] > > Most of the constraints could be well-handled in XML Schemas as well. > The only constraint that it seems that Schematron can express that XML > Schemas could not is the one connecting use of the actor > attribute with > the faultfactor attribute. Some more work could be done > getting lexical > schecking of data values better.Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2000 18:11:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:57 GMT